Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1991No. CX-90-539PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Defendant-appellant appeals from a conviction for possession of crack cocaine, 1 claiming his arrest was invalid, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, and that the trial was flawed by prosecuto-rial misconduct. We affirm.

The afternoon of May 7, 1989, Sgt. Jeffrey Grates set up surveillance of an apartment building on Portland Avenue in Minneapolis, known for its high drug traffic. From a half-block away, Grates observed defendant-appellant Lester Lee Smith standing in the entrance hallway. During a half-hour period, Grates watched as about five cars drove…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. United States v. Barbara Mouzin, United States of America v. Alfonso CarvajalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. BretzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. State v. AllegroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. People v PubratMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API