Legal Opinion

Osawa v. Onishi

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1949No. 30704PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, C. J.

In order that an understanding may be had of the situation existing at the time garnishment proceedings were instituted, and the interpleader action commenced which resulted in the judgment being entered from which this appeal was taken, we shall briefly state the proceedings which led up to and formed the basis of the garnishments.

On August 28, 1946, Golden Land Investment Company, a corporation, instituted an action against Charles Onishi and Frieda Onishi, his wife, in the superior court for King county, on two promissory notes, one executed February 26, 1943, for twenty-five hundred…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McCaslin v. SchoutenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Bates v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Bianco v. LayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Freitag v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Portland Ass'n of Credit Men, Inc. v. EarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Rainier National Bank v. McCrackenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Freitag v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Davis v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API