Bates v. Drake
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Olivek Y. Linn, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fullerton, J.
— In December, 1893, one Alexander S. Bailey and Amanda E. Bailey, bis wife, were tbe owners *449of certain lots in the city of Tacoma, in this state, the title to which stood in the name of Amanda E. Bailey. At the same time the respondent C. M. Drake claimed to he the owner of certain parcels of land situate in Los Angeles county, state of California. The several properties were valued by the parties a.t $12,000. On the 30th day of that month the parties agreed to exchange the properties one for the other, and in pursuance of that agreement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Mitchell v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Spithill v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Hooper v. HenrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Cook v. TibbalsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Brown v. BaldwinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Sallaske v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1913
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.