Legal Opinion

Rainier National Bank v. McCracken

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 7, 1980No. 7433-4-IPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J.—

Facts of Case

Appeals are taken in these consolidated cases from a judgment and three orders of the Superior Court in a fraudulent conveyance case.

The judgment appealed from was based on findings that the conveyance of a seller's interest in a real estate contract was a fraudulent conveyance.

Two of the three orders appealed from were pretrial orders. One ordered the transferees of the contract conveyed to them by the fraudulent conveyance to pay the proceeds they received from the contract into the registry of the court. The other was a contempt order which imposed a $100 per day…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Keller v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Ewing v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Osawa v. OnishiWashington Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. R/L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API