Legal Opinion
Reece v. Motors Ins. Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 23, 1953No. Civ. 5533PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Mildred G. Reece, originally instituted this action against the defendant, Motors Insurance Corporation, to recover under the “theft provision” of a policy issued by Motors Insurance on plaintiff’s Oldsmobile, a 1952-98 Model, Four-Door Sedan; said car was taken by some person, unknown to plaintiff, while the car was parked on a street in Lawton, Oklahoma, the evening of May 21, 1952.
Defendant Motors Insurance in answering admits the issuance of the policy but denies liability thereunder because: (1) plaintiff was not the sole and unconditional owner of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Motor Investment Co. v. City of Knox CityTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Nicewarner v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- American Insurance Co. v. JueschkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Rush v. Boston InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phalen Park State Bank v. ReevesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Young-Peterson Construction, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. The Potomac Insurance Company of the District of Columbia, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Sanders v. HumphreyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
- Donnelly v. Rockwood Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Phalen Park State Bank v. ReevesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.