Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Rockwood Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1986No. S-855Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

Introduction

This appeal raises the question of whether a vendor-creditor’s repossession of a truck falls within the theft provision in the vendee’s insurance policy. The superior court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Rockwood Insurance Company stating that the repossession did not constitute theft in this case. We reverse.

Facts

Joseph Donnelly agreed to purchase a truck from Danny Daniels for $24,000.1 Daniels gave Donnelly a bill of sale that read:

Bill of Sale

Received from Joseph Donnelly

$8,779.51 for my (illegible)

Balance in 1983 (illegible)

Balanc…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Munchick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Castner v. Insurance of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Hubbell v. Farmers Insurance GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Reece v. Motors Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Young-Peterson Construction, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. The Potomac Insurance Company of the District of Columbia, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API