Legal Opinion

Motor Investment Co. v. City of Knox City

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1943No. 8117PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alexander

This suit is between the alleged purchaser of an automobile and one claiming a lien thereon, and involves a construction of the automobile “Certificate of Title Act” (Article 1436-1, Vernon’s Penal Code, Acts 46th Leg., 1939, p. 602.)

Ford Motor Company manufactured an automobile and sold it in due course to Boling-Duggan, a partnership, a dealer in Dallas, and delivered and manufacturer’s certificate along with the automobile. On March 7, 1940, Boling-Duggan sold the vehicle to R. M. Hedrick, taking a chattel mortgage lien for $770.00 of the sale price. Boling-Duggan delivered the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knox City v. Motor Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Associates Discount Corp. v. Rattan Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Motor Investment Co. v. City of HamlinTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pfluger v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Apeco Corporation v. Bishop Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Continental Credit Corporation v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API