Rush v. Boston Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered upon a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff has recovered a judgment in an action brought upon a policy of insurance in the sum of $1,000 against the loss of an automobile by theft, robbery, or pilferage. The evidence sufficiently shows that he owned the automobile; that he sailed for Europe on October 19,1912; that at that time the automobile was in the garage of his- country place in Connecticut ; that on October twenty-seventh one Pope went to plaintiff’s country place and told plaintiff’s caretaker that he was a partner of plaintiff and was taking the car down to have it painted and would return it *50in ten days. The…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. EppsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- LaMotte v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Reece v. Motors Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1953
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Glens Falls Insurance v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.