Legal Opinion

Farquharson v. Travelers Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1982No. Docket 58988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

Plaintiff sought to recover personal injury protection benefits under the no-fault automobile insurance act. Defendant admitted its liability, but contested certain elements of plaintiff’s claim for work-loss benefits. The trial court ruled that plaintiff was entitled to be paid for step increases in his wage rate made after he left work due to his injuries. It ruled, however, that the following were not elements of "income” for the purpose of determining no-fault work-loss benefits:(a) the employer’s contribution to a pension plan;(b) the employer’s payment of health insurance premiums;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Detroit v. Township of RedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Belcher v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krawczyk v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kruzel v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Roth v. Cadillac InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API