Legal Opinion
Krawczyk v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1983No. Docket 69716, 70824PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
In each of these cases, the plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident and was unable to work for a period of time. Each sought first-party no-fault benefits from the insurance carrier. Each plaintiff claimed that certain fringe benefits were recoverable as work loss under § 3107 of the no-fault insurance act. The Court of Appeals panels reached conflicting results. Krawczyk v DAIIE, 117 Mich App 155; 323 NW2d 633 (1982); Farquharson v Travelers Ins Co, 121 Mich App 766; 329 NW2d 484 (1982).
We conclude that the fringe benefits are not recoverable work loss.
I
Mary Ann Krawczyk was injured…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Krawczyk v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Farquharson v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hodge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Freeman v. Colonial Penn InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brashear v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.