Roth v. Cadillac Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P.J.
Are unemployment compensation and trade readjustment benefits, for which plaintiff did not qualify because he had not worked the required number of weeks during the preceding year due to injuries he received in an automobile accident, "work loss” benefits which plaintiff may recover under MCL 500.3107(b); MSA 24.13107(b) *552of the Michigan no-fault insurance act? The trial court held that "work loss” benefits "are payable only for loss of income from work which the injured person would have performed, not, however, for benefits to which an employee might be entitled when he is not working” and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nawrocki v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Krawczyk v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. PorterfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Farquharson v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kruzel v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983