Legal Opinion

Kruzel v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1983No. Docket 63369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Once again we are asked to determine what are "work loss” benefits and "loss of income from work”, as those terms are used in MCL 500.3107(b); MSA 24.13107(b) of the Michigan no-fault insurance act. Specifically, is the amount which the employer was paying for an employee’s hospitalization insurance policy and which was paid by the employee while the employee was not working due to injuries sustained in an automobile accident, a work loss benefit. On March 16, 1982, the trial court answered this question in the affirmative. From that decision and order, defendant appeals by leave granted.

Plain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Krawczyk v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Pries v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Farquharson v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roth v. Cadillac InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API