Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Street

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1986No. 2-85-278-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

FENDER, Chief Justice.

On Motion for Rehearing, relator contends that the two cases cited by this court in support of our holding that the defendant in a medical malpractice case does not have an absolute right to choose the examining physician under TEX.R. CIV.P. 167a are not on point. Relator contends that the cases do not interpret Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35(a), from which the Texas Rule is adopted, and therefore, they are of limited value.

The first case of which relator complains is Helton v. J.P. Stevens Company, 254 N.E. 321, 118 S.E.2d 791 (1961).…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hardy v. RiserDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
  3. Carnine v. TibbettsOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Tugman v. Riverside & Dan River Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  5. Timpte v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. in Re: Ten Hagen Excavating, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  2. Moore v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Sherwood Lane Associates v. O'NEILL, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  4. Sherwood Lane Associates v. O'NEILL, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. in Re Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API