Legal Opinion
Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 19, 2015No. Case No. 15-CIV-61210-BLOOM/VallePublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. [16] (“Motion”), Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, ECF No. [6] (“Am.Compl.”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, all supporting and opposing filings, including Plaintiffs Response, ECF No. [20] (“PI. Resp.”), and Defendant’s Reply, ECF No. [27], and the record in this case. Being fully advised, the Motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth below.
I. Background
On June 6, 2011, Plaintiff Joseph Mink (“Plaintiff” or “Mink”) underwent a hip-replacement surgery. See Am. Compl. at ¶…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Chaparro v. Carnival Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016