In Re the Welfare of U.S.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge *
U.S. appeals the district court’s order certifying him to stand trial as an adult, claiming that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support adult certification. Because the evidence in the record supports the district court’s conclusion that public safety would not be served by keeping U.S. within the juvenile system, we affirm.
FACTS
During the early morning hours of July 2, 1999, U.S., Brian Thunstedt, and Billy Jo Fischer asked B.F. for a ride back to Fischer’s house from a party. When they arrived at Fischer’s house, Thunstedt, who was sitting in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Welfare of IQSSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re the Welfare of S.J.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Welfare of P.C.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Welfare of L.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In re the Welfare of R.D.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re the Welfare of D. W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. E., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.