Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of S.E.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 1988No. C6-87-2259PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Acting Judge.
Appellant was referred for prosecution as an adult by order of the juvenile court. Appellant contests the court’s finding that the prosecution demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that appellant is not suitable for treatment or that the public safety is not served under the provisions of laws relating to juvenile courts.
FACTS
Appellant S.E.M. is an 18-year-old (17 years at the time of the incident) male. He is from an average family and has average intelligence.
In the past, S.E.M. has run away from home. As a result, he spent the summer of 1986…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Welfare of IQSSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- In Re the Welfare of K. P. H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neiman v. AMERICAN NAT. PROP. & CAS. CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of M.E.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Ex Parte JDGSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- J.D.G. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992