Legal Opinion
Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United States, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, Chairman Rhonda K. Schmidtlein, Comm'r Kevin K. McAleenan, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Representative Robert E. Lighthizer, Solarworld Americas, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 15, 2018No. 2018-1718PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dyk, Circuit Judge.
*1342 Silfab Solar Inc., Heliene Inc., Canadian Solar (USA) Inc., and Canadian Solar Solutions Inc. ("appellants") sought a preliminary injunction to bar the enforcement of presidentially imposed tariffs on solar products. The Court of International Trade ("CIT") denied the injunction. We affirm. We conclude that the President's actions here were lawful and that accordingly, appellants have not established a probability of success on the merits as required for a preliminary injunction.
BACKGROUND
I
Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 is commonly known as the "escape clause" and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Dalton v. SpecterSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sumecht Na, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- M.R. Pittman Group, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Ninestar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Solar Energy Industries Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.