Legal Opinion
Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 14, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-73; Court 06-00050PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge.
Plaintiff Mittal Steel Galati S.A. challenges two decisions of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) during the 2003-2004 administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Romania. See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Romania, 71 Fed. Reg. 7,008 (Dep’t of Commerce Feb. 10, 2006) (final results and partial rescission) (“Final Results ”). First, Plaintiff contends that Commerce erred in assigning Plaintiff a total adverse facts available rate of 75.04 percent ad valorem. Second, Plaintiff contends…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Fresh Garlic Producers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- JBF RAK LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Ugine and Alz Belgium, NV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.