J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The suit listed above challenges the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain imported merchandise as “Mfrs. of other textile fiber” and the assessment of duty thereon at the rate of 35 percent ad valorem, plus 25 cents per pound, under paragraph 1312 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dee. 305, T. D. 51802, and the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739.
Plaintiffs claim said merchandise to be properly dutiable at “10% under Par. 1558 and T. D.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Schoenemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- United States v. NeumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Akawa v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Empire Brushes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Steinberg Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Charles Garcia & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.