Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Goldstein
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 23, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-1524PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Defendants seek Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50, or a New Trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. For the reasons that follow, these requests are denied.
Plaintiff Heather Johnson sued David Goldstein and Irving Goldstein as well as the companies they own, Wayne Manor Apartments and Lincoln Management Company, for physical and emotional damages suffered when she was raped in an apartment she rented from the Defendants. The rapist entered Plaintiffs apartment through a window that did not have security…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Williamson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Botek v. Mine Safety Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Community Ass'n Underwriters of America, Inc. v. Rhodes Development Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Blaisdell v. Rochester, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Heather Johnson v. David Goldstein, D/B/A And/or T/a Wayne Manor Apartments, D/B/A And/or T/a Lincoln Management Company, Irving GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Uhlig LLC v. Corelogic, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2023