Legal Opinion

Botek v. Mine Safety Appliance Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1992No. 116 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

This case concerns a remittitur granted by the Superior Court 412 Pa.Super. 641, 594 A.2d 778 (1991) after a Schuylkill County trial court jury awarded substantial damages to Plaintiff-Appellant. The underlying facts are as follows. On March 28, 1982, Plaintiff-Appellant, Anthony J. Botek, was in training at a fire fighting school. After putting on an air pak and mask, Appellant, along with other trainees, entered a truck body containing a barrel of burning fuel oil, all of which was designed to simulate entry into a burning building. The air pak had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Connolly v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Carrozza v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Mendralla v. Weaver Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API