State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Acting Presiding Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether an insurance company which has issued three separate automobile policies covering three separate automobiles owned by the insured is required to pay the maximum uninsured motorist coverage under each policy when the insured is injured while a passenger in a non-owned uninsured vehicle.
Appellee-plaintiff, Cameron Barkley Williams (insured), brought this action against his insurer, appellant-defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (insurer), to recover the proceeds of uninsured motorist benefits…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. StamperWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Bakken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Hampton v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Hammon v. Farmers Insurance GroupIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- McClellan v. Sentry Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.