Legal Opinion

Hammon v. Farmers Insurance Group

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1985No. 14321PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This case presents two issues regarding uninsured motorist coverage in an automobile insurance policy. First, does coverage extend to a claim of bodily injury allegedly caused when an unknown motorist forced the claimants’ vehicle off the road? We hold that it does. Second, is potential recovery on the claim limited only to the policy issued for the particular vehicle involved in the accident? We hold that it is not. Accordingly, we reverse a summary judgment entered against the claim below and we remand for examination of the claim on its merits.

I

Glen and Ethel Hammon sued…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Dullenty v. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Meckert v. Transamerica InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. McGlynn v. Safeco Insurance Companies of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API