Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 4, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3494PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This case involves the uninsured motorist provisions of a motor vehicle liability insurance policy, the issue being whether the coverage can be “stacked”.

Allstate issued the policy to M. L. Hampton, the named insured. The declarations show that three passenger vehicles, a 1964 Chevrolet, a 1969 Plymouth, and a 1972 Dart were each covered by the uninsured motorist coverage provided by the policy. The declarations also state that the coverage and limit of liability under the uninsured motorist coverage is $15,000 each person and $30,000 each accident. For this coverage a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. BridgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Employers Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Edward W. MoleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Upshaw v. Trinity CompaniesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Szumigala v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Goodville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BorrorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Taft v. CerwonkaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. Allstate Insurance v. FerranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API