Legal Opinion

People v. Akey

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1912No. Crim. No. 1692PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Defendant was charged with and convicted of the crime of rape, committed on one Lutie Valentine. Judgment of imprisonment followed and this appeal is from the judgment.

The judgment was reversed by the district court of appeal for the second appellate district and a further hearing granted on application of the respondent by this court.

The reversal by the district court of appeal was based on the conclusion that the trial court erred in giving the following instruction: “The court further instructs the jury that it is not essential to a conviction in this case that the testimony of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. MeravigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. State v. RichardsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. GammageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. BlassingillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API