Legal Opinion

People v. Besold

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1908No. Crim. No. 1423PublishedCited by 52 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, County from an order refusing a new trial, and from an order refusing a continuance. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The defendant, charged with the murder of Cladie Besold, was found guilty of murder of the second degree. His motion for a new trial was denied and judgment of imprisonment for life followed. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

He also seeks to appeal from an order denying his motion for a postponement of the trial. The code does not authorize an appeal from this order. An order denying a motion for a continuance is reviewable on appeal from the judgment, but to obtain a review of such order it is necessary to incorporate the motion, evidence,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. McMonigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API