People v. Mayes
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Los Angeles, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of rape. The first ground on which the reversal of the judgment is sought is, that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict of the jury. The evidence was prima facie sufficient, and it was a question for the jury to determine how far the evidence was worthy of belief; therefore, on this point, we find nothing which would justify us in interfering with the verdict. The court did not err in instructing the jury that the consummation of the offense might be shown by circumstances and the surroundings. Neither was it error to tell the jury that *598…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stephen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- People v. McGeeCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.