Legal Opinion

People v. Britt

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1923No. Crim. No. 946PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHENK, J., pro tem.

The defendant was accused by information in four counts, the first and third counts charging statutory rape on or about the fifteenth day of June, 1921, and on or about the fifteenth day of September, 1920, respectively, and the second and fourth counts charging incest at the same times at which the alleged rape was committed. A verdict of guilty as to each count was returned by the jury. A motion for a new trial as to counts two and four was granted. A similar motion as to counts one and three was denied and sentence thereon was pronounced. Defendant appeals from the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. VertreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People v. BencCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. TarboxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. MeravigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. RallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. State v. DarrahIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API