Legal Opinion
Russell v. Foglio
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2008No. B190168PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOPER, P. J.
Plaintiff Jack Russell appeals following the grant of defendant Chame Foglio’s special motion to strike his complaint for slander and false light invasion of privacy, under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute (undesignated section references are to the Code of Civil Procedure), and from the denial in part of his motion to tax costs, with respect to defendant’s attorney fees. We conclude that plaintiff has failed to perfect an appeal from the anti-SLAPP order. We affirm the attorney fees order.
FACTS
T…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- J. Hyan v. Rosslyn HummerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Baker v. CastaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Melbostad v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Busker Alley Inc. v. KasperbauerSuperior Court of Guam · 2014
- CSAA Insurance Exchange v. HodrojCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.