Thiessen v. Worthington
Oregon Supreme Court
From Clackamas: Thomas A. McBride, Judge. Suit by Henry Thiessen against T. B-. Worthington and others. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean
This is a suit to reform a deed. The facts, in brief, are that in July, 1874, Wm. Atkinson and Thomas and Pilgrim Neil purchased 400 acres of land in Clackamas County under an agreement that Atkinson should take the title to the entire tract, and convey to the Neils the east half thereof. The land was accordingly deeded to Atkinson on the 8th, and on the next day, without any survey having been made, or any steps taken to ascertain the division line, Atkinson conveyed to the Neils what was supposed and intended to be the east half thereof. In the spring of Í876, at the instance of Atkinson…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harn v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Jacobs v. MoseleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Cutler v. CallisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Pickett v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Atchison v. PeaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Drury Et Ux v. PekarOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Harris Et Ux v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Cooley v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Satchell v. DunsmoorOregon Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.