Satchell v. Dunsmoor
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, four in number, from a decree of the circuit court which dismissed their complaint and held that “plaintiffs have ho right, title or interest or claim to the following described real property, to-wit; N y2 of the SE % of Section 14 * * * and that the boundaries of said described property áre as determined in the surveys made by Beasley and Stoehr in 1945.”
The purpose of the complaint was to establish a boundary line. Specifically it sought a decree holding that a line mil by one J. D. Meiser, a civil engineer, in 1938, constituted the true line between the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cutler v. CallisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Kincaid v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Thiessen v. WorthingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Drury Et Ux v. PekarOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Harris Et Ux v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Corson v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980