Legal Opinion

Satchell v. Dunsmoor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, four in number, from a decree of the circuit court which dismissed their complaint and held that “plaintiffs have ho right, title or interest or claim to the following described real property, to-wit; N y2 of the SE % of Section 14 * * * and that the boundaries of said described property áre as determined in the surveys made by Beasley and Stoehr in 1945.”

The purpose of the complaint was to establish a boundary line. Specifically it sought a decree holding that a line mil by one J. D. Meiser, a civil engineer, in 1938, constituted the true line between the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutler v. CallisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Kincaid v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Thiessen v. WorthingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Drury Et Ux v. PekarOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Harris Et Ux v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Corson v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API