Legal Opinion

Harris Et Ux v. Backus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This appeal challenges a decree which the circuit court entered in favor of the plaintiffs in a suit instituted by them to quiet title to property in Douglas county, which the complaint describes by metes and bounds. The plaintiffs, Ben and Alice Harris, are husband and wife. The defendants, Clarence C. and Nellie Backus, are, likewise, husband and wife. There are two other defendants, Walter T. Backus and Reuben H. Mast. The former is the son of the other two Backuses and received his interest in the-property from them. We need not at this point mention the nature of the interest in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kingsley v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Kincaid v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Lennox v. HendricksOregon Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Thiessen v. WorthingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ogilvie v. StacklandOregon Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Drury Et Ux v. PekarOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wampler v. SherwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Blaisdell v. NelsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Cascadia Lumber Co. v. Oregon State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API