Legal Opinion
Miller Bros. Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 14, 1931PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation under the laws of the State of Connecticut, with its office and headquarters in Hartford, is engaged in the construction of state highways, and in October, 1928, was so engaged in this State and the State of New York.- In August, 1929, the plaintiff was constructing a state highway in Brookfield in this State, and James H. DeGray of East Hartford was hired by the plaintiff as an oiler and general mechanic and was sent to the Brook-field job where he worked until sometime in October, 1929. By his experience he had become a man of general utility and able to handle…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Harivel v. Hall-Thompson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Weingarten v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.