Legal Opinion
Witchekowski v. Falls Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The compensation commissioner found that the plaintiff suffered an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, and decided that he was entitled to receive compensation therefor, and no question is raised as to the correctness of that portion of the award. The injury was caused by a truck passing over the plaintiff’s foot. This occurred on May 25th, 1923, but he was not disabled until September 19th, 1923, and the compensation awarded.was for disability thereafter suffered. On May 25th, 1923, the employer carried a policy of insurance covering his liability under the Workmen’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. TwissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Cormican v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Schultz v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Phillips v. Holmes Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Claim of Hargraves v. George F. Shevlin Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by17 opinions
- Miller Bros. Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Johnson v. MortensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- New York Indemnity Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Rousu v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Mund v. Farmers' Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.