Legal Opinion

Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 5, 1981No. A7705-06426, CA 12346PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*563BUTTLER, J.

This case requires us to examine for the first time the dollar limitations on tort liability of governmental agencies in ORS 30.270. Two related issues are presented. The first is whether the statutory dollar limitation is waived if it is not asserted before judgment. The second is whether the legislature intended that the ceiling on the amount of liability be held to be waived when a government exercises the authority contained in ORS 30.282 and purchases liability insurance in excess of the statutory limits.1

These questions are presented in the context of a wrongful death action…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Vendrell v. School District No. 26COregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dowers Farms, Inc. v. Lake CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Christensen v. EpleyOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. NowlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Murrell v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
  4. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Watson v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API