Luckenbach v. Krempel
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.
The appellants ask for a writ of supersedeas. The writ is asked to stay proceedings for the collection of a judgment for $5,955.40 recovered by Luckenbach against Krempel-Preston Company in the superior court of Los Angeles County on January 6, 1919. There are separate appeals, one by the defendant Preston and the other by the three defendants, Chris Krempel, Anna Krempel, and Lucy Hauerwaas. As they both involve the same' question they will be considered together.
On April 15, 1919, on application of the plaintiff the court appointed Willard L. Goodwin receiver of the property of said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- McAneny v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Endresse v. Van VleetMontana Supreme Court · 1946
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.