Legal Opinion

Draper v. MULLENNEX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1960PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This matter had its origin in the District Court for Multnomah County. There the respondent Mullennex, as plaintiff and as assignee of Boyd and Erwin, attorneys, brought action for professional services upon a balance due in the amount of $600, together with interest at six per cent from December 2, 1957. The petitioner, as the defendant in that action, moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that the court did not have jurisdiction of the subject matter for the reason that the amount demanded was in excess of $1,000. The manner of computing the excess by the petitioner will…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Land Board v. SovenkoOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Salitan v. DashneyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Doyle v. KammeraadMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Patterson v. SkoglundOregon Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hardwick v. Dravo Equipment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Henry P. Jaeger and M. Darlene Jaeger v. The Canadian Bank of Commerce (California)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Huffstutter v. LindOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Pritchett v. FryOregon Supreme Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API