Legal Opinion

Landeros v. Pankey

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1995No. B082190PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), Acting P. J.

This case illustrates that settling an unlawful detainer action does not necessarily settle all disputes arising from a residential landlord-tenant relationship and that, in order to assure finality of litigation, the settlement documents must be comprehensive.

Introduction

Plaintiffs and appellants Pauline and Jesus Landeros were formerly tenants in a home owned by defendants and respondents Dana and Ruth Pankey, individually and as tmstees. A prior unlawful detainer action resulted in a stipulated judgment, with plaintiffs vacating the premises. Eight months…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stoiber v. HoneychuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. California State Automobile Ass'n. Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Rice v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Tennison v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Malkoskie v. Option One Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Erlach v. Sierra Asset Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API