Thuillez v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wertz, J.:
This action was brought by a workman’s dependents to recover compensation for his death under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act (G. S. 1949, Ch. 44, Art. 5, as amended by G. S. 1959 Supp., Ch. 44, Art. 5). Both the workmen’s compensation commissioner and the trial court made findings of fact in favor of the claimants — the widow and the minor children — and allowed compensation. Respondents (appellants) bring the case here and contend the trial court erred in finding there was substantial evidence that decedent sustained…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Carney v. HellarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Hilyard v. Lohmann-Johnson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Anderson v. Kinsley Sand & Gravel, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Jacobs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Pence v. Centex Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Craig v. Electrolux CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Bohanan v. Schlozman Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.