Legal Opinion

Bohanan v. Schlozman Ford, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1961No. 42,464PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This action was brought by a workman’s dependents to recover compensation for his death under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act (G. S. 1949, Ch. 44, Art. 5, as amended). Both the workmen’s compensation commissioner and the trial court made findings of fact in favor of claimants (appellees) — the widow and the minor children — and allowed compensation. Respondents (appellants) bring the case here and contend the trial court erred in finding there was substantial evidence to support the finding that the death of decedent arose…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Carney v. HellarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Workman v. Johnson Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Thuillez v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lyon v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Siebert v. HochSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Shapiro v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Orr v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  5. Geurian v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API