Konczakowski v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ objection to defendants’ motion for production of certain *362items under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. is that the income tax returns requested by defendants are privileged. Plaintiffs are in error as to this contention. The law is well-settled that income tax returns are not privileged from discovery and production under Rule 34. Orange County Theatres, Inc. v. Levy, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1938, 26 F.Supp. 416; Judson v. Buckley, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1940, 3 Fed.Rules Serv. 395; Nola Electric, Inc. v. Reilly, D.C. S.D.N.Y.1950, 11 F.R.D. 103;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
- Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. RamDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
- Karlsson v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Mullins v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Shaver v. Yacht Outward BoundDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Wharton v. Lybrand, Ross Bros. & MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.