Legal Opinion

Karlsson v. Wolfson

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1956No. Civ. No. 5277PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEYITT, District Judge.

This is a motion under Rule 34, 28 U.S. C.A., for an order requiring the plaintiff to produce and permit the defendants to inspect and copy plaintiff’s income tax returns.

Plaintiff, a citizen of Sweden and a professional wrestler, has brought action against the defendant hotel company asking for damages in the sum of $500,000 on account of injuries allegedly sustained by him in a fall on the defendants’ hotel stairway on July 5, 1955, at a time when he was a guest at the hotel.

In response to defendants’ motion for the production of his income tax returns, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  2. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. RamDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
  3. Tollefsen v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
  4. Garrett v. FaustDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Nola Electric, Inc. v. ReillyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  2. Tiedman v. American Pigment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Matchen v. McGaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Carlson Companies, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API