Karlsson v. Wolfson
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DEYITT, District Judge.
This is a motion under Rule 34, 28 U.S. C.A., for an order requiring the plaintiff to produce and permit the defendants to inspect and copy plaintiff’s income tax returns.
Plaintiff, a citizen of Sweden and a professional wrestler, has brought action against the defendant hotel company asking for damages in the sum of $500,000 on account of injuries allegedly sustained by him in a fall on the defendants’ hotel stairway on July 5, 1955, at a time when he was a guest at the hotel.
In response to defendants’ motion for the production of his income tax returns, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. RamDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
- Tollefsen v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- Garrett v. FaustDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Nola Electric, Inc. v. ReillyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
3Cited by23 opinions
- A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Tiedman v. American Pigment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Matchen v. McGaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Carlson Companies, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.