Legal Opinion
Wharton v. Lybrand, Ross Bros. & Montgomery
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 27, 1966No. Nos. 65-C-664, 64-C-946PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MISHLER, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant, Lybrand, Ross Bros. & Montgomery (Lybrand) for an order directing co-defendants Arthur N. Field and Field, Florea & Field (Field) to produce documents for inspection and copying under Rule 34.
The multi-count complaints (consolidated by order of this Court) charge individual defendants who were officers and/or directors of Continental Vending Machine Corp. and Continental Apeo Inc., debtors in a reorganization proceeding under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, with various schemes to divert money and assets of the debtors, and to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richard Hauger v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959
- Carpenter-Trant Drilling Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1959
- States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942
- Rockaway Pix Theatre, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Norman v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Biliske v. American Live Stock InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Davidson Pipe Co. v. Laventhol & HorwathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Hagemeyer North America, Inc. v. Gateway Data Sciences Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Norman v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.