Legal Opinion

United States v. Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 7, 1906No. 268 (1,595)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Vermont.

1Per curiam

The importations m controversy were invoiced as' “rossed pulp wood,” and consisted of spruce wood in the form of sticks or logs of about 10 inches diameter, cut in lengths of about two feet, and “rossed.” They belong to the class of woods, chiefly poplar and spruce, used for making pulp in the manufacture of paper. Before the date of the present tariff act they were imported in various forms, cut into suitable lengths; sometimes with the bark on; generally with the bark peeled off; and occasionally, though seldom, “rossed,” that is, with the bark, skin, and rough places of the log removed by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hiller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. Franklin CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Cannon v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Cummins Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  5. United States v. MacNaughtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API