Legal Opinion

Holdwire, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 23, 1962No. C.D. 2355PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Certain imported steel tying wire was assessed with duty at the compound rate of 9% per centum ad valorem and %o cent per pound, pursuant to the provision in paragraph 316 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, for round iron or steel wire, valued at over 6 cents per pound, and galvanized (T.D. 51802, infra).

It is the claim of the plaintiff that the wire specified in invoices 791 and 795 of entry number 836866, covered by the instant protest, is dutiable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. MacNaughtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. L. Tobert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amitt Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Carborundum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  3. De Vahni International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Brylanwire, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API