Legal Opinion

Arp v. Blake

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1926No. Docket No. 3086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this suit in equity to enfi rce his right to contribution founded upon his payment of a certain judgment obtained by one Ranseh against the plaintiff, the defendant Blake and one Hewitt, in the sum of $1,050 and interest. The plaintiff was awarded judgment, from which this appeal is prosecuted by the defendants under the so-called alternative method. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953a.)

The present is the final outgrowth of several other actions previously tried and determined, a recital of the history of which is deemed necessary to a clear understanding of the issue submitted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Blake v. ArpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Ransch v. Arp.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Blake v. ArpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. McGranahan v. Rio Vista Joint Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API