Legal Opinion

Ransch v. Arp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1919No. Civ. No. 2385PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appeal taken from a judgment entered against the appellant after default taken because of his failure to answer the complaint of plaintiff.

Appellant urges as ground for reversal the points presented under a demurrer which he interposed to the complaint. The grounds of demurrer were, first, that neither of the two alleged causes of action were sufficiently stated; and, second, that two causes of action were improperly joined, to wit: One upon an open book account and one for the value of premises alleged to have been tortiously obtained and held. Plaintiff in his first alleged cause of action…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Samuels v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Vernon v. Plumas Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Duke v. ThornburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API