Legal Opinion
Blake v. Arp
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1920No. Civ. No. 3264PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are" stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Both plaintiff and defendant appear as appellants in this action, neither being satisfied with "the order made in the superior court.
On the twenty-fifth day of October, 1915, plaintiff obtained judgment against the defendant for a considerable sum of money. On the third day of June, 1919, plaintiff assigned this judgment to one Cohn. On January 9, 1917, in an action brought against the plaintiff and defendant and one Hewitt, judgment was recovered in the sum of $1,050, with interest and costs. An appeal was taken from that judgment by defendant Arp, and the judgment was thereafter affirmed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dow v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Haskins v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coonan v. LoewenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- San Joaquin Valley Bank v. Gate City Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- DeVries v. Naegele CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014