Edwards v. Doster-Northington Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Appellant was awarded compensation for the loss of her husband according to provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code Í923, §§ 7543-7597). Defendant conceded the justice of appellant’s claim in general and offered to pay in installments. Appellant demanded compensation by lump sum, but this feature of appellant’s claim was refused, and the trial court held that, in the absence of an agreement between the parties, it had no jurisdiction to order a lump sum payment in lieu of installments to fall due. The single question presented for review is whether an agreement betweeix the parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Anseth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- American Zinc Co. v. LuskTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Bailey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minnifield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Henry v. McCormack Bros. Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- United States Steel Corporation v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Landauer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. DillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.