American Zinc Co. v. Lusk
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox County. — Hon. Von A. Huffaker, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ci-iambliss
From a, judgment below awarding compensation for total disability to its employee, Fielding Lusk, the zinc company has appealed; while Lusk has also appealed from so much of the judgment as refused to order commutation of his award.
It is conceded that Lusk was an employee and was injured in the course of his employment, but it is insisted that the proof shows that while one eye was altogether lost, five per cent, of the sight of the other remained, and that this percentage of normal sight might be increased to fifteen per cent, by the use of proper corrective glasses, and that this condition…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cline v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Moore v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Milne v. SandersTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Keyworth v. MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1919
- Claim of Boscarino v. Carfagno & Dragonette, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Perdue v. Green Branch Min. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Consolidation Coal Company v. CrislipCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Griffith v. GoforthTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.